From owner-freebsd-current  Mon Sep 18 05:25:24 1995
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id FAA13963
          for current-outgoing; Mon, 18 Sep 1995 05:25:24 -0700
Received: from Root.COM (implode.Root.COM [198.145.90.17])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id FAA13958
          for <freebsd-current@freefall.freebsd.org>; Mon, 18 Sep 1995 05:25:18 -0700
Received: from corbin.Root.COM (corbin [198.145.90.34]) by Root.COM (8.6.12/8.6.5) with ESMTP id FAA03970; Mon, 18 Sep 1995 05:23:47 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by corbin.Root.COM (8.6.12/8.6.5) with SMTP id FAA03560; Mon, 18 Sep 1995 05:26:06 -0700
Message-Id: <199509181226.FAA03560@corbin.Root.COM>
To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
cc: hsu@cs.hut.fi, joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de,
        freebsd-current@freefall.freebsd.org
Subject: Re: pci bus and current?? 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 18 Sep 95 21:28:53 +1000."
             <199509181128.VAA21483@godzilla.zeta.org.au> 
From: David Greenman <davidg@Root.COM>
Reply-To: davidg@Root.COM
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 1995 05:25:43 -0700
Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

>>(How to make buffers larger to catch more of the messages in dmesg?)
>
>>Sep 17 02:30:12 router /kernel: 32(ffffff80)
>>Sep 17 02:30:12 router /kernel:         map(24): mem32(ffffff80)
>>Sep 17 02:30:13 router /kernel: pci0:14: vendor=0xff80, device=0xffff [no driver
>> assigned]
>>...
>
>You would need an 8MB buffer :-).
>
>>Sep 17 02:30:23 router /kernel: bpf: ds0 attached
>>Sep 17 02:30:23 router /kernel: bpf: lo0 attached
>>Sep 17 02:30:23 router /kernel: bpf: ppp0 attached
>>...
>>Sep 17 02:30:29 router /kernel: bpf: ppp31 attached
>>Sep 17 02:30:29 router /kernel: bpf: sl0 attached
>>...
>>Sep 17 02:30:30 router /kernel: bpf: sl15 attached
>>Sep 17 02:30:30 router /kernel: bpf: tun0 attached
>>...
>>Sep 17 02:30:33 router /kernel: bpf: tun31 attached
>
>There are too man bpf messages and not enough messages for the individual
>pseudo-devices.

   I think we should kill the "bpf: xxn attached" messages completely. I know
I'm not alone in this thinking...

-DG