From owner-freebsd-sysinstall@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 7 05:40:07 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sysinstall@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE797106564A for ; Fri, 7 Oct 2011 05:40:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD9E98FC0A for ; Fri, 7 Oct 2011 05:40:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p975e7sc054803 for ; Fri, 7 Oct 2011 05:40:07 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p975e73f054799; Fri, 7 Oct 2011 05:40:07 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2011 05:40:07 GMT Message-Id: <201110070540.p975e73f054799@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-sysinstall@FreeBSD.org From: Nathan Whitehorn Cc: Subject: Re: bin/161046: bsdinstall(8): partition creation dialog should default to max X-BeenThere: freebsd-sysinstall@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Nathan Whitehorn List-Id: Sysinstall Work List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2011 05:40:07 -0000 The following reply was made to PR bin/161046; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Nathan Whitehorn To: Benjamin Kaduk Cc: bug-followup@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bin/161046: bsdinstall(8): partition creation dialog should default to max Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2011 23:34:22 -0500 On 10/06/11 21:28, Benjamin Kaduk wrote: > On Thu, 6 Oct 2011, nwhitehorn@freebsd.org wrote: > >> Synopsis: bsdinstall(8): partition creation dialog should default to max >> >> State-Changed-From-To: feedback->closed >> State-Changed-By: nwhitehorn >> State-Changed-When: Thu Oct 6 14:16:53 UTC 2011 >> State-Changed-Why: >> Trouble using edit-pr today: anyway, the installer has always done >> what you >> suggest here. >> >> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=161046 > > Hi Nathan, > > Sorry for the big pile of PRs all at once -- I just wanted to get > mentioned issues off mailing lists and into a more noticable place. > > The main desire here was with respect to having the 'size' field > pre-filled (as opposed to using the max size if the field is left blank). > Alas, I don't have a machine handy on which to test right now and > confirm, but I'm pretty sure that I never saw the 'size' field get > pre-filled. Do you believe that it should be? I can test again, later. > > Thanks again for all the tireless work. Thanks for the reports -- it makes things much easier to keep track of. The size field should definitely be pre-filled, and is at least on my machine. -Nathan