From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Oct  5 16:51:06 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27C5616A412
	for <freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org>;
	Thu,  5 Oct 2006 16:51:06 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9A0643E1B
	for <freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org>;
	Thu,  5 Oct 2006 16:50:26 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k95GoPva078458
	for <freebsd-bugs@freefall.freebsd.org>; Thu, 5 Oct 2006 16:50:25 GMT
	(envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org)
Received: (from gnats@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k95GoPiT078457;
	Thu, 5 Oct 2006 16:50:25 GMT (envelope-from gnats)
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2006 16:50:25 GMT
Message-Id: <200610051650.k95GoPiT078457@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
From: Eugene Grosbein <eugen@www.svzserv.kemerovo.su>
Cc: 
Subject: Re: kern/103841: [fdc] fdc(4) does not work (regression)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Eugene Grosbein <eugen@www.svzserv.kemerovo.su>
List-Id: Bug reports <freebsd-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-bugs>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2006 16:51:06 -0000

The following reply was made to PR kern/103841; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Eugene Grosbein <eugen@www.svzserv.kemerovo.su>
To: Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org>
Cc: FreeBSD Stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>, bug-followup@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: kern/103841: [fdc] fdc(4) does not work (regression)
Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2006 00:48:21 +0800

 On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 10:48:52PM +0800, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
 
 > > >It's definetely a regression from 4.11-STABLE that runs fine on this 
 > > >system with ACPI fully enabled 
 > 
 > Hmm, I was wrong about 4.11 using ACPI - it does not use it here really,
 > it uses "good old" APM.
 > 
 > > It would be interesting to know how 4.x probes the hardware vs. how it 
 > > apperas in the 6.x dmesg.
 > 
 > 4.11-STABLE:
 > 
 > fdc0: <NEC 72065B or clone> at port 0x3f0-0x3f5,0x3f7 irq 6 drq 2 on isa0
 > fdc0: FIFO enabled, 8 bytes threshold
 > fd0: <1440-KB 3.5" drive> on fdc0 drive 0
 > 
 > 6.2-PRERELEASE:
 > 
 > fdc0: <floppy drive controller> port 0x3f0-0x3f5,0x3f0 irq 6 drq 2 on acpi0
 > fdc0: [FAST]
 > fd0: <1440-KB 3.5" drive> on fdc0 drive 0
 
 I managed to know that fdc_initial_reset() in sys/dev/fdc/fdc.c
 probes my fdc controller as "Enhanced floppy controller" (ic_type==0x90) vs.
 4.x's "NEC close". BTW, does in possible to obtain fdc's probe result vs.
 fdc_acpi's result without addition of call to
 "fdc_print_child(device_get_parent(dev), dev);" to fdc_initial_reset()?
 
 I've forced sys/dev/fdc/fdc.c to probe my controller as "NEC clone"
 by moving "case 0x90:" upwards to "case 0x80" in this function
 but that does not help, no change in behavour was observed.
 
 Eugene Grosbein