From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 22 02:48:14 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16CFC16A4D0 for ; Fri, 22 Apr 2005 02:48:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ace.botka.homeunix.org (3.77.broadband2.iol.cz [83.208.77.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4701B43D45 for ; Fri, 22 Apr 2005 02:48:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vlado@botka.homeunix.org) Received: by ace.botka.homeunix.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id C83664ED7; Fri, 22 Apr 2005 04:48:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from srv (ac.botka.homeunix.org [192.168.1.5]) by ace.botka.homeunix.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 269F14BEE; Fri, 22 Apr 2005 04:48:08 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2005 04:48:07 +0200 (CEST) From: Vladimir Botka X-X-Sender: vlado@localhost To: Paul Mather In-Reply-To: <1114123141.43365.122.camel@zappa.Chelsea-Ct.Org> Message-ID: <20050422043444.O6842@localhost> References: <1114123141.43365.122.camel@zappa.Chelsea-Ct.Org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on ace.botka.homeunix.org cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org cc: Claus Guttesen Subject: Re: vinum or gvinum on FreeBSD 5.4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2005 02:48:14 -0000 Hi, vinum is not stable under 5.4. After some "research" I found gmirror (RAID1) is ok. There are some notes on: http://www.freebsd.org/releases/5.3R/errata.html Cheers, Vladimir. On Thu, 21 Apr 2005, Paul Mather wrote: > On Thu, 2005-04-21 at 10:39 +0200, Claus Guttesen wrote: >> Hi. >> >> I may implement (g)vinum to stripe two 2 TB raid 5 volumes into a >> single 4 TB vinum-volume. The volumes reside on a atabeast doing the >> raid 5. The server is a 5.4 RC2 doing nfs on i386. >> >> According to some threads gvinum may not be completely stable (in 5.3, >> http://unix.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/FreeBSD/current/2004-11/0537.html) >> when doing raid 5 but works fine when striping. >> >> Should I go vinum or gvinum? Will newfs have problems with a 4 TB >> volume? Are there any performance-degradation doing striping? > > In addition to vinum and gvinum, have you considered geom_stripe? See > gstripe(8) for details. I've been using it for a while on 5-STABLE to > join two 65 GB slices on two different drives into a single 130 GB > device (/dev/stripe/data in my case). I have had no stability problems, > which is why I mention this as a possible solution for you if you're > worried about the stability of vinum or gvinum in 5.x. > > Cheers, > > Paul. > -- > e-mail: paul@gromit.dlib.vt.edu > > "Without music to decorate it, time is just a bunch of boring production > deadlines or dates by which bills must be paid." > --- Frank Vincent Zappa > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > >