From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Sun Dec 6 22:58:54 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF3679A00DD for ; Sun, 6 Dec 2015 22:58:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from mail-wm0-x22c.google.com (mail-wm0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 61BCE1DF0 for ; Sun, 6 Dec 2015 22:58:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: by wmww144 with SMTP id w144so120152874wmw.1 for ; Sun, 06 Dec 2015 14:58:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bris-ac-uk.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:message-id:to:subject:reply-to; bh=RuzCsIm3z2clB/8C0Lq/rISY5Yfrt2i227OJQAKDLe0=; b=posgYuVQ6JPwVoD20VGzUO7Pdnp3ZeJMTDNkoCK4G5gHYZYJ2212KRzrawfWSUVf+b l4QOg9JVGRYGiMYau4BPU4W+ykwCRySNV+ag8VdmquBCi26LF4FXKrbHaYoY7YySpklU ZUC/D/qd0KzTLQ2OQCULuH5yCdgCMWAgyON0pP0tps9VrKnTxa1wfAI/bIE4oRjrJ2mi 8LEsN1q46rkuioONqQtXkGnY20DzU80G20vk+HHLBm4GYP+g4tbKO8+purNheKVZbtqm vy+qmUemtV3ZFNw5ACqUU0RYU5PHyHULH/sTZcVltCAskOhAMcpj4Z3hA4Td5o+0eiSH VTMw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:message-id:to:subject:reply-to; bh=RuzCsIm3z2clB/8C0Lq/rISY5Yfrt2i227OJQAKDLe0=; b=I6mdIvIEi+J0WsbP5U53HFxiio0dxpeY+bPpmecp4m5X4HK77p8fVq9CvhaxMMcOmL 1KH+m1y5nobTbxSvycT5WK9o/M93b61Cy89gs1/k0rfJp0ETcp5XaVH6RSaiQaoGX6b/ 5/kL31YyLr1U26QNSOvy3BQjYLARZ+6fd3IrJvJYPmH/bXHKhry0S3yVz1mkc19TXWn7 0TsomlZQEx+/z1JjpT4m5bQmak5zV1pl4yA8HPDDXOXJWNKvYjK2QUU2h0UTldtTkx7S poS9ZggoTfsA3C+oHBwYSKPx7F6ROxSjQIhYTOdtCIH7qPascyscYUul4V72UvbvPJ/l sgEA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQk6YFUPc4ntNI99x/krNgshp2Wq1lfTXVAuKurokYFZESZ4HRfnXWHUczEhTZ4113gl5Ykb X-Received: by 10.194.80.101 with SMTP id q5mr35346790wjx.59.1449442731722; Sun, 06 Dec 2015 14:58:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk (mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk. [137.222.170.4]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d2sm22431482wjy.16.2015.12.06.14.58.51 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 06 Dec 2015 14:58:51 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 06 Dec 2015 14:58:51 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Original-Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2015 22:58:50 GMT Received: from mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id tB6MwoBv043401; Sun, 6 Dec 2015 22:58:50 GMT (envelope-from mexas@mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id tB6MwoAX043400; Sun, 6 Dec 2015 22:58:50 GMT (envelope-from mexas) From: Anton Shterenlikht Message-Id: <201512062258.tB6MwoAX043400@mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Subject: seems to be solved in r291907: WAS: Re: urtwn regression(?) from 10.2 to current r291431 Reply-To: mexas@bris.ac.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Dec 2015 22:58:55 -0000 >From mexas Sun Dec 6 14:44:25 2015 >To: adrian@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, hps@selasky.org, mexas@bris.ac.uk >Subject: Re: urtwn regression(?) from 10.2 to current r291431 >Reply-To: mexas@bris.ac.uk >In-Reply-To: <5664472E.3090601@selasky.org> > >>From hps@selasky.org Sun Dec 6 14:41:27 2015 >> >>On 12/06/15 15:14, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: >>> I posted this about a week ago: >>> >>> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2015-November/058683.html >>> >>> The problem is that urtwn stopped >>> working in current r291431. >>> >>> I did more testing with the same revision, >>> and sometimes it would work, but extremely >>> slowly, and sometimes seemingly associate >>> but get an address of 0.0.0.0. >>> >>> I now installed 10.2-RELEASE-p8 and >>> the urtwn works fine, no issues at all. >>> >>> Does this look like a bug at some recent >>> current revision? Should I file a PR? >>> >>> I's just I recall there have been major >>> chages to wlan, so perphaps I'm forgetting >>> to change the config in recent current? >>> >>> Please advise >>> >>> Anton >> >>Hi, >> >>There is work ongoing in the WLAN drivers. Did you try the latest -current? >> >>--HPS > >r291431 was about a week ago. >Will try latest -current later today. Seems to be solved in r291907. Can anybody reproduce this? Anton