From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Dec 9 19:48:47 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mailhub.yumyumyum.org (dsl092-171-091.wdc1.dsl.speakeasy.net [66.92.171.91]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 84CCB37B405 for ; Sun, 9 Dec 2001 19:48:44 -0800 (PST) Received: (qmail 3667 invoked from network); 10 Dec 2001 03:48:35 -0000 Received: from ken.yumyumyum.org (HELO there) (192.168.0.2) by dsl092-171-091.wdc1.dsl.speakeasy.net with SMTP; 10 Dec 2001 03:48:35 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Kenneth Culver To: Peter Wemm Subject: Re: Performance issue Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2001 22:49:08 -0500 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.1] References: <20011209232328.31DC43810@overcee.netplex.com.au> In-Reply-To: <20011209232328.31DC43810@overcee.netplex.com.au> Cc: hackers@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: <20011210034844.84CCB37B405@hub.freebsd.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG If they're using gcc to compile then that doesn't really matter, last I heard gcc's optimizer wasn't that great, and didn't result in much faster code, but if the glibc people hand optimized stuff, I can see your point. Ken > > This means that Linux's glibc is using an i686 optimized bzero(), but > the FreeBSD one is using an i386 optimized bzero(). > > Cheers, > -Peter To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message