From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 12 14:37:19 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 180A116A403 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 14:37:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from davidt@yadt.co.uk) Received: from outcold.yadt.co.uk (outcold.yadt.co.uk [81.187.204.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB87513C474 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 14:37:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from davidt@yadt.co.uk) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by outcold.yadt.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 409001DD4DC; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 14:09:58 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at yadt.co.uk Received: from outcold.yadt.co.uk ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (outcold.yadt.co.uk [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xyM3bweEQYuc; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 14:09:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: by outcold.yadt.co.uk (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 897EF1DD4F5; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 14:09:50 +0000 (GMT) Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 14:09:50 +0000 From: David Taylor To: David Syphers Message-ID: <20070112140950.GA71126@outcold.yadt.co.uk> Mail-Followup-To: David Syphers , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <438465.16988.qm@web32710.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <200701041327.52134.dsyphers@u.washington.edu> <200701041339.36221.fcash@ocis.net> <200701042129.00139.dsyphers@u.washington.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200701042129.00139.dsyphers@u.washington.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: win32-codecs question ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 14:37:19 -0000 On Thu, 04 Jan 2007, David Syphers wrote: > On Thursday 04 January 2007 13:39, Freddie Cash wrote: > > If a port supports the OPTION framework, then the first time you run make [snip] > > And a mention of it in /usr/ports/UPDATING > > and/or /usr/ports/CHANGES. > > Now, this I read. And no, it's not documented there. The only mentions in > UPDATING are under postfix entries, and I don't use postfix. The entries in > CHANGES wouldn't catch your eye unless you knew what you were looking for - > everything assumes prior knowledge of what OPTIONS is and what it implies. The third entry in CHANGES mentions it in passing. It appears to have been introduced before the CHANGES file started. -- David Taylor