From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 6 07:20:02 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 864FB16A41B for ; Thu, 6 Dec 2007 07:20:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7059C13C474 for ; Thu, 6 Dec 2007 07:20:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id lB67K2C7044087 for ; Thu, 6 Dec 2007 07:20:02 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.2/8.14.1/Submit) id lB67K24s044086; Thu, 6 Dec 2007 07:20:02 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2007 07:20:02 GMT Message-Id: <200712060720.lB67K24s044086@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?S=F8ren_Schmidt?= Cc: Subject: Re: kern/83702: [ata] ata CDRIOCGETPROGRESS ioctl does not work whenblanking CD-RW X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?S=F8ren_Schmidt?= List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2007 07:20:02 -0000 The following reply was made to PR kern/83702; it has been noted by GNATS. From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?S=F8ren_Schmidt?= To: Eugene Grosbein Cc: Eugene Grosbein , bug-followup@FreeBSD.ORG, roberto@FreeBSD.ORG, sos@FreeBSD.ORG, Sen Farley Subject: Re: kern/83702: [ata] ata CDRIOCGETPROGRESS ioctl does not work whenblanking CD-RW Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2007 08:17:04 +0100 Eugene Grosbein wrote: > S=DBren Schmidt wrote: > =20 >> Eugene Grosbein wrote: >> =20 >>> Hi! >>> >>> This PR is the same as >>> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3Dkern/104270 >>> >>> The problem is fixed in CURRENT before RELENG_7 was branched >>> so 7.0-BETAs are not affected but there was no MFC to RELENG_6 nor >>> to RELENG_5 that both affected. >>> >>> >>> =20 >> ATA has been backported to releng_6 as well. >> =20 > > Oops... Almost 4 weeks ago. Thank you for pointing out. > Well, kern/104270 with analysis and preliminary (proof of concept ;-) p= atch > arrived in October 2006, so I didn't check very often last months. > > If there would not be MFC to RELENG_5, both PRs should be closed now > (and perhaps others, there were lots of complaints about this issue). > =20 Well, releng_5 is off my radar so .... -S=F8ren