From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 21 05:19:58 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB41116A423 for ; Sun, 21 May 2006 05:19:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kip.macy@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0102.google.com (wx-out-0102.google.com [66.249.82.192]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81F3D43D45 for ; Sun, 21 May 2006 05:19:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kip.macy@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id i31so735211wxd for ; Sat, 20 May 2006 22:19:58 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=PvlHsS8NLST0LQjQkhkPku7wBZ4WZVzv5VheLOeIIrGEh4vEfeLbTKkNj8WsT/m/Oh5h5Xg2cuIm9lCsHnKDOIxwixTRAYzVHX4x4d81uXsA+b3aPsSkOCWbMag9xriYquvNSIgG9fGzMhon8dJ1KpUP+Oak1J/2gEDm5c0diIY= Received: by 10.70.11.10 with SMTP id 10mr3869627wxk; Sat, 20 May 2006 22:19:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.71.2 with HTTP; Sat, 20 May 2006 22:19:58 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 22:19:58 -0700 From: "Kip Macy" To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Subject: FreeBSD is now self-hosting on the UltraSPARC T1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: kmacy@fsmware.com List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 05:20:21 -0000 I'm proud to announce that FreeBSD on the T1 is now stable enough that it can "make buildworld" natively. The source is currently available in perforce under the view //depot/projects/kmacy_sun4v/... I probably won't roll it back into CVS until the logical domaining support is done. I'm looking forward to receiving input from individuals who plan to deploy it to find out what workloads to target in performance tuning. -Kip