From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 9 15:57:58 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2083C106564A for ; Wed, 9 Feb 2011 15:57:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from David.Boyd@insightbb.com) Received: from mxsf12.insightbb.com (mxsf12.insightbb.com [74.128.0.94]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0F0A8FC18 for ; Wed, 9 Feb 2011 15:57:56 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.60,446,1291611600"; d="scan'208";a="261578748" Received: from unknown (HELO asav02.insightbb.com) ([172.31.249.123]) by mxsf12.insightbb.com with ESMTP; 09 Feb 2011 10:28:54 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ap4GAANCUk1KgYlR/2dsb2JhbACJbI08jht0vD8NhU8EhH8 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.60,446,1291611600"; d="scan'208";a="428597481" Received: from 74-129-137-81.dhcp.insightbb.com (HELO sneezy) ([74.129.137.81]) by asav02.insightbb.com with SMTP; 09 Feb 2011 10:28:53 -0500 From: "David Boyd" To: Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 10:28:53 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5994 Importance: Normal Subject: new dialog/libdialog testing X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2011 15:57:58 -0000 Having some time to test 9.0-CURRENT with the new dialog command has uncovered only one major omission (for us): prgbox/dialog_prgbox. This is used in most (if not all) of our installation/management scripts. Was prgbox omitted for any particular reason? I realize that change is inevitable. Is there a better approach to running a program in a window? We like many of the new features presented, but are wary of problems down the road due to the omission of prgrbox. I notice that sysinstall uses dialog_prgbox in 8.1-RELEASE.