From owner-freebsd-arch Tue May 7 14: 7: 3 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from apollo.backplane.com (apollo.backplane.com [216.240.41.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A98637B401; Tue, 7 May 2002 14:07:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from apollo.backplane.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by apollo.backplane.com (8.12.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id g47L6YgQ000380; Tue, 7 May 2002 14:06:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dillon@apollo.backplane.com) Received: (from dillon@localhost) by apollo.backplane.com (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id g47L6YuT000379; Tue, 7 May 2002 14:06:34 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 7 May 2002 14:06:34 -0700 (PDT) From: Matthew Dillon Message-Id: <200205072106.g47L6YuT000379@apollo.backplane.com> To: "David O'Brien" Cc: arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: syscall changes to deal with 32->64 changes. References: <200205071940.g47Jehl84130@apollo.backplane.com> <20020507131314.B29014@dragon.nuxi.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG : :On Tue, May 07, 2002 at 12:40:43PM -0700, Matthew Dillon wrote: :> the way for us to allow natively compiled multi-architectural support. :> e.g. consider this: :> :> cc -ABI4 ... :> cc -ABI5 ... :> cc -ABILinux ... :> cc -ABIOpenBSD ... : :Honestly, why do we have this need? It seems to fall into the "it would :be nice"; but seldomly used. Well, how do you intend to test the new ABI vector? -Matt Matthew Dillon To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message