Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2001 23:23:08 +0100 From: Joerg Wunsch <j@uriah.heep.sax.de> To: Jake Burkholder <jake@locore.ca> Cc: Adam Kranzel <adam@blacktabby.org>, alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Kernel builds broken? Message-ID: <20011218232308.A97821@uriah.heep.sax.de> In-Reply-To: <20011217120232.E39205@locore.ca>; from jake@locore.ca on Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 12:02:32PM -0500 References: <20011217083319.25adda22.adam@blacktabby.org> <20011217120232.E39205@locore.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
As Jake Burkholder wrote: > It looks like the ifdefs to skip some of the code for non-i386 are > broken. > > #if _MACHINE_ARCH == i386 in fd_probe() should be #ifdef __i386__. I've reverted it to #ifdef __i386__ now. Still, i think this is the wrong way, since it's now testing for a particular CPU type, not for a machine type. (Or do we have __pc98__ on the PC98?) IMHO, FreeBSD/Alpha should be fixed instead to not define _MACHINE_ARCH to be equal i386. <machine/param.h> has something like: #ifndef _MACHINE #define _MACHINE alpha #endif #ifndef _MACHINE_ARCH #define _MACHINE_ARCH alpha #endif Hmm, i wouldn't expect this to also be equal to i386, but i cannot find where alpha, i386, ia64 etc. are actually defined. -- cheers, J"org .-.-. --... ...-- -.. . DL8DTL http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011218232308.A97821>