From owner-freebsd-wireless@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 3 11:16:08 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 746C0833; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 11:16:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-oi0-x236.google.com (mail-oi0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::236]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3109917B2; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 11:16:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oi0-f54.google.com with SMTP id a3so5330072oib.41 for ; Wed, 03 Sep 2014 04:16:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=UfLDGFzm0ARaC/ttsn5JjjKZeC2gnvHnoBn7Ny9gGJc=; b=KU99HWTkmQAMqzYuVZnZkdg+crthxPCr8g9nNWC0hMjFvSJD/zKYLAoE6RAeiq/wF/ ajsN1SxBMzezf2kO2w20h6IaZvWW89FqYlO9MMpjV0LcdCc9FJjsaj9+RWx4H/b6elbC Ha9lo0KfjVClCqg2yErH7MqKz5Xgro0OGbR9hpItAKcxzgMPqXifyad7Wnn7E6Zabei+ 7RXUXeBEtDT/fWuxzDP7tsQjj424GlOm9gFAiBsWezHIC+5xMv3rGtr9sDInApY65vqL 6fdH8dmyIV/Nb+3e8vs1Brm8kC/DptPEWn67zlamhh6kdJu0c5Z/La3uFcOVVkD59B9K WtlQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.120.129 with SMTP id lc1mr7618879obb.65.1409742967487; Wed, 03 Sep 2014 04:16:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.182.28.100 with HTTP; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 04:16:07 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2014 13:16:07 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Intel Centrino Wireless-N 2230 status From: Oliver Pinter To: Adrian Chadd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: "freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussions of 802.11 stack, tools device driver development." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 11:16:08 -0000 Or not, I forgot the -ht option in rc.conf. G STA + G AP = ok G STA + N AP = ok N STA + N AP = fail On 9/3/14, Oliver Pinter wrote: > Hi! > > Small status update: > The mode N works too, I mistyped the other AP's passwork. > So both mode G and mode N working after the backports. > > BTW, can you MFC the same changes to 10.1? > > On 9/2/14, Adrian Chadd wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Compile it with IWN_DEBUG, then >> >> sysctl dev.iwn.0.debug=0x1 >> >> >> -a >> >> >> On 2 September 2014 12:41, Oliver Pinter wrote: >>> I not tried freebsd-head yet, but I'm able today. In mode N seems like >>> the NIC sends only one frame, and no more. >>> >>> With tcpdump and/or wlandebug I see only rx packets and no tx. >>> >>> If you add some pointer what changes must I create to easier debug, or >>> what concrete information required, feel free to ping me or send the >>> details. >>> >>> On 9/2/14, Adrian Chadd wrote: >>>> Cool! Have you tried freebsd-head? Does it work there? >>>> >>>> How's it failing in association state? What's it saying? >>>> >>>> >>>> -a >>>> >>>> >>>> On 2 September 2014 12:30, Oliver Pinter wrote: >>>>> Hi All! >>>>> >>>>> After I backported all of the net80211 and iwn changes from 11-CURRENT >>>>> to 10-STABLE the wireless NIC in subject working on mode G. If I try >>>>> to use with mode N (ht20, ht40) it failed in association state. >>>>> >>>>> All of the backports are in this github repo: >>>>> >>>>> https://github.com/opntr/opBSD/commits/op/stable/10-iwn-backport >>>>> >>>>> Oliver >>>> >> >