From owner-freebsd-security@freebsd.org Sat Sep 19 00:37:16 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-security@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D95B0A039BC for ; Sat, 19 Sep 2015 00:37:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brett@lariat.org) Received: from mail.lariat.net (mail.lariat.net [66.62.230.51]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B4851D8C for ; Sat, 19 Sep 2015 00:37:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brett@lariat.org) Received: from Toshi.lariat.org (IDENT:ppp1000.lariat.net@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.lariat.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA15072; Fri, 18 Sep 2015 08:44:33 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <201509181444.IAA15072@mail.lariat.net> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9 Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 08:44:04 -0600 To: Ben Bailess , freebsd-security@freebsd.org From: Brett Glass Subject: Re: HTTPS on freebsd.org, git, reproducible builds In-Reply-To: References: <7BAECC2B-5001-47D6-9199-8549697E7807@spam.lifeforms.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Security issues \[members-only posting\]" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2015 00:37:16 -0000 At 08:07 AM 9/18/2015, Ben Bailess wrote: >I have to echo this sentiment -- authentication is important, and so is >integrity. HTTPS would provide both -- to be sure you're talking to the >"real" FreeBSD and give you confidence that your page content has not been >altered in transit by a network adversary (e.g. if you are using Tor)*. I'd mainly be concerned about downloads of distros or updates being tampered with. Worms are appearing that infect not only PCs but also routers (e.g. the "Moon" worm, which affected most Linksys models available at the time), setting up a perfect scenario for an MITM attack that could substitute an infected file AND a forged checksum for the originals. If an HTTPS download site were available, I would absolutely prefer it to an HTTP one. Just my $0.02 USD. --Brett Glass