From owner-freebsd-mobile Wed Mar 12 16:23:13 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3798937B401; Wed, 12 Mar 2003 16:23:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from eurus.primus.ca (mail.tor.primus.ca [216.254.136.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A27843FBD; Wed, 12 Mar 2003 16:23:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from leth@lethargic.dyndns.org) Received: from dialin-163-145.tor.primus.ca ([216.254.163.145] helo=lethargic.dyndns.org) by eurus.primus.ca with esmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 3.36 #3) id 18tGV3-0007jO-0A; Wed, 12 Mar 2003 19:23:10 -0500 Received: from lethargic.dyndns.org (leth@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lethargic.dyndns.org (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h2D0NFEG096073; Wed, 12 Mar 2003 19:23:15 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from leth@lethargic.dyndns.org) Received: (from leth@localhost) by lethargic.dyndns.org (8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) id h2D0NDrN096072; Wed, 12 Mar 2003 19:23:13 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 19:23:12 -0500 From: Jason Hunt To: "Bruce A. Mah" Cc: "M. Warner Losh" , mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: wi patch Message-ID: <20030313002312.GB96009@lethargic.dyndns.org> References: <20030301.093910.15267989.imp@bsdimp.com> <20030310232254.GA64763@intruder.bmah.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030310232254.GA64763@intruder.bmah.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 03:22:54PM -0800, Bruce A. Mah wrote: > If memory serves me right, M. Warner Losh wrote: > > These patches make my lucent cards almost useful They are in 1Mbps > > mode, it seems, but at least they work with a fair amount of > > reliability. Don't try to set the media just yet. > > Hi Warner-- > > I'm almost hesitant to post this, but I tried this patch, and a > Lucent WaveLan Silver card that I have is still a paperweight. Out of curiosity, what's so bad about these cards? I'll admit that I've used nothing other than Lucent cards, but I don't find anything to complain about with them. They seem to work fine talking to each other and I can't complain about speeds or reliability of the signal. Maybe it's just because I have nothing to compare them to? :) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-mobile" in the body of the message