From owner-freebsd-fs Fri Feb 23 3:34:22 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from relay.butya.kz (butya-gw.butya.kz [212.154.129.94]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F8D237B401 for ; Fri, 23 Feb 2001 03:34:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bp@butya.kz) Received: by relay.butya.kz (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 89DA528D48; Fri, 23 Feb 2001 17:34:05 +0600 (ALMT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay.butya.kz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82D2128D17; Fri, 23 Feb 2001 17:34:05 +0600 (ALMT) Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2001 17:34:05 +0600 (ALMT) From: Boris Popov To: Terry Lambert Cc: Peter Wemm , Pat Lashley , freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Status of nullfs In-Reply-To: <200102230549.WAA09447@usr05.primenet.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Terry Lambert wrote: > > Terry, please check your facts. This has been recently fixed. See the > > VOP_GETVOBJECT() stuff. The trick though is to get it MFC'ed into > > 4.x... > > Cool; I was unaware that this had been done. This was even the > approach I advocated from a casual look at it on the CVS web. > Last I had heard of this, people were still advocating alias > objects. > > Things like this should really be talked about on the -FS list, > don't you think? Well, they was and I'm recall that you even replied to my post :) See http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=0+0+/usr/local/www/db/text/2000/freebsd-fs/20000910.freebsd-fs for start of the thread. -- Boris Popov http://www.butya.kz/~bp/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-fs" in the body of the message