From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 29 01:01:51 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E0341A1 for ; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 01:01:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-oi0-x22c.google.com (mail-oi0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22c]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6277CE70 for ; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 01:01:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oi0-f44.google.com with SMTP id a3so21859687oib.3 for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 17:01:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=z6iI5WEPKMXGb+/HNykhcdFbat8is6k+/N1q9VgDvHM=; b=snT6h5N++6CDV2ty6mJxwgvsG5h5XgHiq1DGtF5iz7qdueZ0c8YnV3O56ab2blVrXs bJnP2/Aq7ylbNRTgSrnogbNTf6Kkc5HqV+VLTpX3QGqiEoxZaFZ3YNYjQKHk9eSEIZLS SVl5PqIDkCYILRHPX/MxEACBs5RnIyxpL3HLoVHPFN4Y5oIS5RJA8xcz1Dq4nJKjXuYD fKGGw2S6zvZNtfio/7cvya8VVN5/eCz/qIrSBABtj+bTz/wA6HNRN1a9rooSaeEvz3mO NwGinDjpvS/zq7eH3jnXbCOEGtr7aPZ2VY+sLDHrk1SnjIMvxZh7B7UVjYMbZIB+yEyS GqhA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.202.59.131 with SMTP id i125mr3709079oia.125.1422493310687; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 17:01:50 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.182.247.74 with HTTP; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 17:01:50 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.182.247.74 with HTTP; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 17:01:50 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <54C9837C.8090704@akips.com> References: <20150128194011.2175B19F@hub.freebsd.org> <20150128211910.80082283DA18@rock.dv.isc.org> <54C966BF.9000803@rewt.org.uk> <54C9837C.8090704@akips.com> Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 17:01:50 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-15:02.kmem From: jungle Boogie To: Nick Frampton Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Security issues \[members-only posting\]" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 01:01:51 -0000 Hi Nick, On Jan 28, 2015 4:56 PM, "Nick Frampton" wrote: > > On 29/01/15 08:46, Joe Holden wrote: >> >> Really, how many SCTP users are there om the wild... maybe one? >> >> It shouldn't be in GENERIC at the very least! > > > We use Netflow over SCTP in our network monitoring product, so it would be a pain to have to build a custom kernel. But also a pain to have an exploit when it could be prevented. Its all about trade offs, right? > > Nick > -- > Founder, CTO > www.akips.com > >