From owner-freebsd-hubs@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 8 20:53:57 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49DC616A4B3; Wed, 8 Oct 2003 20:53:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.freebsdmall.com (ns1.freebsdmall.com [65.60.36.76]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B5E343FF3; Wed, 8 Oct 2003 20:53:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from murray@freebsdmall.com) Received: by mail.freebsdmall.com (Postfix, from userid 2074) id 06F601CC63; Wed, 8 Oct 2003 20:53:27 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2003 20:53:27 -0700 From: Murray Stokely To: Oliver Fromme Message-ID: <20031009035326.GF75593@freebsdmall.com> References: <20031008152356.GH7209@freebsdmall.com> <200310081554.h98FsbLV079911@lurza.secnetix.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200310081554.h98FsbLV079911@lurza.secnetix.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-GPG-Key-ID: 1024D/0E451F7D X-GPG-Key-Fingerprint: E2CA 411D DD44 53FD BB4B 3CB5 B4D7 10A2 0E45 1F7D cc: re@freebsd.org cc: hubs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 4.9-RC2 is on ftp-master.. X-BeenThere: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD Distributions Hubs: mail sup ftp List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2003 03:53:57 -0000 On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 05:54:37PM +0200, Oliver Fromme wrote: > The subdirectory should be called "4.9-RC2", of course, > not just "4.9". And for the actual release, it should Adding a single directory for each single ISO file adds complexity for users and wastes inodes. We don't need to hide the ISOs behind so many levels of indirection. That may appeal to your sense or orthogonality but it's a huge waste of time for anyone actually trying to download the files. The 4.9-RC directory that Ken suggested would at least not waste a new directory for each single file. > Currently, there is a significant inconsistency, which > needs to be fixed. IMO. It is consistent right now in that releases have their own directory, since they contain more than one file and will be around for a long time. The individual temporal files do not have their own directory. It is consistent with that design. Now that we're no longer doing 5 ISO images per release, we may not need ANY extra subdirs off the ISO-IMAGES dir, as we didn't have them before 4.4. - Murray