From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sat Nov 18 22:49:42 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D74EDDE492 for ; Sat, 18 Nov 2017 22:49:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jim@netgate.com) Received: from mail-ot0-x22a.google.com (mail-ot0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c0f::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2CAFD8053F for ; Sat, 18 Nov 2017 22:49:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jim@netgate.com) Received: by mail-ot0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id s4so4892730ote.4 for ; Sat, 18 Nov 2017 14:49:42 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=netgate.com; s=google; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=2TvJVj8UJC4Mp2jiex7qFytCEM9o+JH+KfN7EmH1/so=; b=fiN4NgxS7c089eHhhLpDrfsjk2pcTqAEo1ZGGzs2N9jELQTK9LTQpgvrIznqGIPggp zkFTEGZkaXFeneyf0iTzrSvmuClvhhzprMs/Xs5O0HsPEU25rnZVYH4efv5aP9MY8VJv iTWbyB7qLuS2CP9uyzMRQbj+7ZC8pSnTVr+ZE= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=2TvJVj8UJC4Mp2jiex7qFytCEM9o+JH+KfN7EmH1/so=; b=FTf5Ve+sYTs80m0Bh/zbQLa3Q2aUVQsV8Crj2v3Coi9kDRkJTfB+yQY+hWBk2Cg/4f hez8Z+AwEkUsskA8iEIPpAPT6PUYBuKWGVFix57dm8DFe9Jthe+6HTG/DY9TtVWpAfKm 3mravMKoxMAVASuEwFuJSFufsUBDN1O+JtRCX2lhhQNbjZgpvM9XqwlF++fdvPZv3RPn v9Qc3v+oneiAIa5HrF7CfMP49xzwHa215Yeu69gyPxvIk955w0DPhBgxVKu++qwL78NV l11rt3erafCKp70tBXQcoZ6YfACRgqTkeS0MCfOp8tu+rEBiCKa0Mfma+D1iCbDY/yxa H7xw== X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX6hjWbOp+haFWfGcEfUvdjUq6pQ2xovXlMgrYCiTksvRjy7u58E Kw68r6DBBCZcCJLs299IshjQDkonH5Q= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMZCJsxLZQBXxPDzm8v4tawmGRTtzXO+XELTeIF/FGVMRPTM78eBZxnG2Bc2flkI8o8qIcfYzQ== X-Received: by 10.157.12.150 with SMTP id b22mr5565128otb.390.1511045380922; Sat, 18 Nov 2017 14:49:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from [172.21.0.131] (65-36-116-65.dyn.grandenetworks.net. [65.36.116.65]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 94sm3221659otq.16.2017.11.18.14.49.40 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 18 Nov 2017 14:49:40 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Subject: Re: OpenVPN vs IPSec From: Jim Thompson X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (15B93) In-Reply-To: <20171118165842.GA73810@admin.sibptus.transneft.ru> Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2017 16:49:39 -0600 Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <20171118165842.GA73810@admin.sibptus.transneft.ru> To: Victor Sudakov X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2017 22:49:42 -0000 Performance is better with IPsec. It=E2=80=99s a standard, too.=20 > On Nov 18, 2017, at 10:58 AM, Victor Sudakov wrote: >=20 > Dear Colleagues, >=20 > Is there any reason to prefer IPSec over OpenVPN for building VPNs > between FreeBSD hosts and routers (and others compatible with OpenVPN > like pfSense, OpenWRT etc)? >=20 > I can see only advantages of OpenVPN (a single UDP port, a single > userland daemon, no kernel rebuild required, a standard PKI, an easy > way to push settings and routes to remote clients, nice monitoring > feature etc). But maybe there is some huge advantage of IPSec I've > skipped? >=20 > --=20 > Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN > AS43859 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"