From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Oct 23 22:36:41 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from out4.mx.nwbl.wi.voyager.net (out4.mx.nwbl.wi.voyager.net [169.207.1.77]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFDF537B479 for ; Mon, 23 Oct 2000 22:36:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pop4.nwbl.wi.voyager.net (pop4.nwbl.wi.voyager.net [169.207.2.83]) by out4.mx.nwbl.wi.voyager.net (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id e9O5aai39204 for ; Tue, 24 Oct 2000 00:36:36 -0500 (CDT) Received: from tabby (d167.as20.nwbl0.wi.voyager.net [169.207.139.169]) by pop4.nwbl.wi.voyager.net (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id e9O5aZ306263 for ; Tue, 24 Oct 2000 00:36:35 -0500 (CDT) Message-Id: <200010240536.e9O5aZ306263@pop4.nwbl.wi.voyager.net> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ed0 broken in 4.1.1 ? In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 23 Oct 2000 10:56:53 PDT." <20001023105653.N23934@stout.troikanetworks.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2000 00:39:01 -0500 From: David Deaven Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Kevin, I have the same NIC, and have seen a similar problem. Try unconfiguring support for "lnc" NICs, the probe for that one killed the probe for "ed" in my box. In some cases (config IRQ/addr) the probe actually hangs. Dave >I upgraded to 4.1.1 via make buildworld/installworld. When I >booted the new kernel, it didn't see my ethernet NIC. It >didn't say 'not found'; it didn't mention the card AT ALL. >Yet it does show the ed0 configuration: >> en ed0 >... > >I suspected I screwed something up and proceeded to make >and boot 4.1.1 boot/install floppies. That kernel didn't >mention my ethernet card either! > >I managed to keep a 4.1.0 GENERIC kernel around and so I'm >successfully running with it but, since the rest of my >system is 4.1.1, I'd really like the 4.1.1 kernel to see >my card. > >It's a D-Link DE-something, NE2000 compatible AFAIK. It >uses ed0, of course. It does not use the standard IO >address or IRQ but I entered those wherever needed (and, >if I got them wrong, I'd expect a message saying 'ed0 >not found at ...'.) > >I haven't seen anyone else mention the problem on -questions. >Any ideas anyone ? > >P.S. Reply address is bogus, please reply to list. > > >To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org >with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message > -- ------------------------------------- David Deaven deaven@execpc.com http://www.execpc.com/~deaven To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message