Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2006 11:35:54 +0100 From: Guy Brand <gb@isis.u-strasbg.fr> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: For the love of God, is it even possible to make the Atheros ath.patch & updated HAL actually work? Message-ID: <20060203103553.GC1038@chimie.u-strasbg.fr> In-Reply-To: <1b62a7390602011159l6c43827ei31e25e2d315185a3@mail.gmail.com> References: <1b62a7390602011159l6c43827ei31e25e2d315185a3@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 01 february at 14:59, Ryan R wrote: > I have been racking my brain for DAYS trying to get Sam Leffler's ( > http://people.freebsd.org/~sam ) ath.patch and updated HAL binary to work in > *ANY* version of FreeBSD. > [...] > > Does anybody have even the slightest clue when this code may actually make > it into the kernel sources? Or better yet, does the patch cleanly apply and > compile for ANYBODY? It seems that I could be member of this ANYBODY: FreeBSD 6.1-PRERELEASE #5: Fri Feb 3 09:13:13 CET 2006 ath_hal: 0.9.16.13 (AR5210, AR5211, AR5212, RF5111, RF5112, RF2413, RF5413, DFS) ath0: <Atheros 5212> mem 0xfe710000-0xfe71ffff at device 0.0 on cardbus1 ath0@pci4:0:0: class=0x020000 card=0x6804a727 chip=0x001b168c rev=0x01 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Atheros Communications Inc.' That's a 3CRPAG175B 3com card and it works for me with Sam's patch adapted for RELENG_6. I can send it to you if you want, but it would be wiser to wait for Sam's new and clean patches. -- gb
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060203103553.GC1038>