Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2016 16:13:48 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 211353] mail/sendmail failing during staging under poudriere FreeBSD 11+ Message-ID: <bug-211353-9824-NekYhf67S9@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-211353-9824@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-211353-9824@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D211353 --- Comment #4 from John Marino <marino@FreeBSD.org> --- Why should I have to continue to expend energy on what appears to be a unilateral action? Why is not my explicit request enough to put this to be= d? I fundamentally disagree with most of what you said. You can't, on one hand, say that ports@FreeBSD.org means "community maintai= ned" ports rather than unmaintained ports and on the other hand say that PRs can= 't be similarly community maintained. Most of what I do is spend a few hours of my time dispositioning old PRs because nobody else spent any effort to do so. That does NOT imply that I = want any future responsibility for the PR. We are all responsible for individu= al commits we make, so clearly I accept that. I've said I don't want to be the "real assignee"; if I wanted that I would = have changed the assignment myself.=20 If this "policy" is already documented, please point to where it's publishe= d.=20 I don't recall ever seeing a proposal on this asking for feedback. It just started happening. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-211353-9824-NekYhf67S9>