Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 15:04:06 +0000 From: "Jeff Rollin" <jeff.rollin@gmail.com> To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Fwd: Possibility for FreeBSD 4.11 Extended Support Message-ID: <8a0028260612220704v7bbef9a3i6ae3b4bb5333c4b3@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <8a0028260612220626x8eb22d4k64fde88e24e3fee2@mail.gmail.com> References: <200612221343.21237.lofi@freebsd.org> <E1Gxkgk-0009V0-0j@dilbert.ticketswitch.com> <8a0028260612220626x8eb22d4k64fde88e24e3fee2@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Jeff Rollin <jeff.rollin@gmail.com> Date: 22-Dec-2006 14:26 Subject: Re: Possibility for FreeBSD 4.11 Extended Support To: Pete French <petefrench@ticketswitch.com> On 22/12/06, Pete French <petefrench@ticketswitch.com> wrote: > > > Because everybody knows that odd numbered releases aren't stable. > > I've been 20 years in electronics & comouting and thats the first > time I have ever heard anyone say that! Steer clear of '.0' releases > is well known, but suspecting something just because of the odd or > evenness of it's numbering scheme seems like pure superstition. > > Especually since we are Unix people, and the two of the > 'biggies' in history are Version 7, System 5 ;-) > > Personally I took that as a joke... Jeff -- Now, did you hear the news today? They say the danger's gone away But I can hear the marching feet Moving into the street Adapted from Genesis, "Land of Confusion" http://latedeveloperbasketcase.blogspot.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?8a0028260612220704v7bbef9a3i6ae3b4bb5333c4b3>