From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Mar 5 6:20:28 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from assaris.sics.se (assaris.sics.se [193.10.66.234]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 965D637B718; Mon, 5 Mar 2001 06:20:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from assar@assaris.sics.se) Received: (from assar@localhost) by assaris.sics.se (8.9.3/8.9.3) id PAA56655; Mon, 5 Mar 2001 15:20:19 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from assar) To: "Jacques A. Vidrine" Cc: Mark Murray , freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/kerberos5/usr.bin Makefile src/kerberos5/usr.bin/k5su Makefile References: <200103051118.f25BIZW85891@freefall.freebsd.org> <20010305065158.C78960@spawn.nectar.com> From: Assar Westerlund Date: 05 Mar 2001 15:20:18 +0100 In-Reply-To: "Jacques A. Vidrine"'s message of "Mon, 5 Mar 2001 06:51:58 -0600" Message-ID: <5lk864thzx.fsf@assaris.sics.se> Lines: 13 User-Agent: Gnus/5.070098 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.98) Emacs/20.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG "Jacques A. Vidrine" writes: > Will we always have this dichotomy between kblah/k5blah utilities? It is > fairly annoying. Anecdotally, there don't seem to be many new Kerberos > IV installations, & Kerberos V's utilities can get/list/trash version 4 > & 5 tickets. Yes. My current plan of things to happen (in -current and after 4.3) is to ditch the v4 programs basically and install the v5 ones under the canonical names (with v4-compatibility if compiled in). And to always build and install the krb5 programs/libraries, but ifdef'ing the support in other programs. How does that sounds? /assar To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message