From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 10 09:02:18 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D14216A4DA for ; Mon, 10 Jul 2006 09:02:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maxim@macomnet.ru) Received: from mp2.macomnet.net (mp2.macomnet.net [195.128.64.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D60443D46 for ; Mon, 10 Jul 2006 09:02:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from maxim@macomnet.ru) Received: from localhost (localhost.int.ru [127.0.0.1] (may be forged)) by mp2.macomnet.net (8.13.7/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k6A92Abx035638; Mon, 10 Jul 2006 13:02:10 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from maxim@macomnet.ru) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 13:02:09 +0400 (MSD) From: Maxim Konovalov To: Sam Leffler In-Reply-To: <44B15511.206@errno.com> Message-ID: <20060710125919.D35569@mp2.macomnet.net> References: <44B15511.206@errno.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: vlans and cloning X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 09:02:18 -0000 [...] > This would change the user api but otherwise I can see no reason for > continuing to support the old mechanism where you do: > > ifconfig vlan create > ifconfig vlan0 vlan 1 vlandev em0 > > Anyone _against_ nuking the above? As you said it will break POLA and a number of scripts outside our tree. If it doesn't cost much for us I wouldn't killed "ifconfig vlan create". -- Maxim Konovalov