From owner-freebsd-smp Tue Nov 12 22:47:17 1996 Return-Path: owner-smp Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id WAA28474 for smp-outgoing; Tue, 12 Nov 1996 22:47:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from mx.serv.net (mx.serv.net [199.201.191.10]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id WAA28469; Tue, 12 Nov 1996 22:47:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from MindBender.serv.net by mx.serv.net (8.7.5/SERV Revision: 2.30) id WAA11475; Tue, 12 Nov 1996 22:47:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost.HeadCandy.com (michaelv@localhost.HeadCandy.com [127.0.0.1]) by MindBender.serv.net (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id WAA08610; Tue, 12 Nov 1996 22:47:02 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199611130647.WAA08610@MindBender.serv.net> X-Authentication-Warning: MindBender.serv.net: Host michaelv@localhost.HeadCandy.com [127.0.0.1] didn't use HELO protocol To: "Rodney W. Grimes" cc: scrappy@ki.net, smp@csn.net, smp@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: GigaByte GA-586DX-512 Motherboard In-reply-to: Your message of Tue, 12 Nov 96 13:24:27 -0800. <199611122124.NAA17321@GndRsh.aac.dev.com> Date: Tue, 12 Nov 1996 22:47:01 -0800 From: "Michael L. VanLoon -- HeadCandy.com" Sender: owner-smp@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk >> >>I recommend 64meg of parity. Don't really have direct knowledge of EDO vs not. >> > Hrmmm...I had thought that EDO RAM was better because it had >> >'on chip' cache or something like that ... >> Uh, no. EDO RAM simply takes less clock cycles per access than >> standard (or FPM) RAM. >You should go read some technical specifications before you make such >statements. The actual access time changes very very little between >EDO (``Extended Data Out'') and FPM (``Fast Page Mode''). The only >real effective difference is that EDO memory holds it's data outputs [...] No thank you. I have enough to keep me very busy already. I am not a hardware engineer. I understand the _effect_ of running EDO RAM, and that is that cycle times can generally be shorter, in typical modern motherboards. You can argue about the electical intricacies if you want, but I have better things to do. I'm sure you know what you're talking about, and I may get around to looking at this info some time in the future (I am always curious about the intricacies of the hardware, and generally understand it fairly well). But right now, I don't have the time. How am I wrong in stating that "the effect of running EDO RAM in a typical modern motherboard is that you can run with shorter cycle times"? ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Michael L. VanLoon michaelv@MindBender.serv.net --< Free your mind and your machine -- NetBSD free un*x >-- NetBSD working ports: 386+PC, Mac 68k, Amiga, Atari 68k, HP300, Sun3, Sun4/4c/4m, DEC MIPS, DEC Alpha, PC532, VAX, MVME68k, arm32... NetBSD ports in progress: PICA, others... -----------------------------------------------------------------------------