From owner-freebsd-chat  Sun Mar  2 13:48:42 1997
Return-Path: <owner-chat>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id NAA05023
          for chat-outgoing; Sun, 2 Mar 1997 13:48:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from crh.cl.msu.edu (crh.cl.msu.edu [35.8.1.24])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id NAA05018
          for <freebsd-chat@freebsd.org>; Sun, 2 Mar 1997 13:48:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from henrich@localhost)
          by crh.cl.msu.edu (8.8.5/8.8.4)
	  id QAA10985; Sun, 2 Mar 1997 16:48:07 -0500 (EST)
From: Charles Henrich <henrich@crh.cl.msu.edu>
Message-Id: <199703022148.QAA10985@crh.cl.msu.edu>
Subject: Re: 2.2 Compiler slower than 2.1? (was RSA 56-bit key challenge)
To: ejs@bfd.com (Eric J. Schwertfeger)
Date: Sun, 2 Mar 1997 16:48:07 -0500 (EST)
Cc: hasty@rah.star-gate.com, jmb@freefall.freebsd.org, jkh@time.cdrom.com,
        taob@risc.org, freebsd-chat@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.95.970302134236.27933A-100000@harlie.bfd.com> from "Eric J. Schwertfeger" at "Mar 2, 97 01:46:00 pm"
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL22 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-chat@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

>> Now if we can convince bror@sms.fi to overclock his dual pentium and get him
>> the new client we may be able to beat the dual 400mhz alpha 8)
>
> If you check the stats page, you'll notice he just changed his listing
> from 606k keys/sec to 676k keys/sec, so he has the updated binary.  The
> wonders of mime attachments :-)

I see how you are Amancio!  Did you single user a nice -20 to get 396? :)

-Crh

       Charles Henrich     Michigan State University     henrich@msu.edu

                         http://pilot.msu.edu/~henrich