Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2018 03:08:13 +0900 (JST) From: Yasuhiro KIMURA <yasu@utahime.org> To: jankyj@unfs.us Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ClamAV Port Version Regression?,ClamAV Port Version Regression? Message-ID: <20181212.030813.957817995646118898.yasu@utahime.org> In-Reply-To: <7971a617-6aa9-c18e-d53e-fbd8985bb043@unfs.us> References: <7971a617-6aa9-c18e-d53e-fbd8985bb043@unfs.us>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello Janky.
From: "Janky Jay, III" <jankyj@unfs.us>
Subject: ClamAV Port Version Regression?,ClamAV Port Version Regression?
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 10:51:43 -0700
> After a portsnap to pull ${latest), I'm seeing the following:
>
> clamav-0.101.0_2 < needs updating (index has 0.100.2,1)
>
> The version that is claiming to be the latest appears to be a version
> regression. Am I wrong here? I checked the ClamAV site and it appears
> version 0.101.0 is, in fact, the latest. So, I'm wondering if there was
> possibly a revision issue that's causing this?
The problem about libclamav API is found in 0.101.0.
http://lists.clamav.net/pipermail/clamav-users/2018-December/007236.html
This results in build error of some ports that depends on
security/clamav. So it is downgraded to 0.100.2 until 0.101.1 is
released.
---
Yasuhiro KIMURA
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20181212.030813.957817995646118898.yasu>