From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Dec 11 18:08:46 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 216B7130CF4E for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 18:08:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yasu@utahime.org) Received: from gate.utahime.jp (ipq210.utahime.jp [183.180.29.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 009F083E14 for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 18:08:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yasu@utahime.org) Received: from eastasia.home.utahime.org (eastasia.home.utahime.org [192.168.174.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gate.utahime.jp (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D5EF241E; Wed, 12 Dec 2018 03:08:32 +0900 (JST) Received: from eastasia.home.utahime.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost-backdoor.home.utahime.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C9736711; Wed, 12 Dec 2018 03:08:31 +0900 (JST) Received: from localhost (rolling.home.utahime.org [192.168.174.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by eastasia.home.utahime.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 928C96710; Wed, 12 Dec 2018 03:08:30 +0900 (JST) Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2018 03:08:13 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20181212.030813.957817995646118898.yasu@utahime.org> To: jankyj@unfs.us Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ClamAV Port Version Regression?,ClamAV Port Version Regression? From: Yasuhiro KIMURA In-Reply-To: <7971a617-6aa9-c18e-d53e-fbd8985bb043@unfs.us> References: <7971a617-6aa9-c18e-d53e-fbd8985bb043@unfs.us> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.8 on Emacs 26.1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 009F083E14 X-Spamd-Bar: + Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of yasu@utahime.org designates 183.180.29.210 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=yasu@utahime.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [1.82 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+a:spf-authorized.utahime.org]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[utahime.org]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[mx1.utahime.org,mx2.utahime.org]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MID_CONTAINS_FROM(1.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.66)[-0.656,0]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:2519, ipnet:183.180.0.0/16, country:JP]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; IP_SCORE(0.29)[ip: (0.65), ipnet: 183.180.0.0/16(0.32), asn: 2519(0.55), country: JP(-0.09)] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 18:08:46 -0000 Hello Janky. From: "Janky Jay, III" Subject: ClamAV Port Version Regression?,ClamAV Port Version Regression? Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 10:51:43 -0700 > After a portsnap to pull ${latest), I'm seeing the following: > > clamav-0.101.0_2 < needs updating (index has 0.100.2,1) > > The version that is claiming to be the latest appears to be a version > regression. Am I wrong here? I checked the ClamAV site and it appears > version 0.101.0 is, in fact, the latest. So, I'm wondering if there was > possibly a revision issue that's causing this? The problem about libclamav API is found in 0.101.0. http://lists.clamav.net/pipermail/clamav-users/2018-December/007236.html This results in build error of some ports that depends on security/clamav. So it is downgraded to 0.100.2 until 0.101.1 is released. --- Yasuhiro KIMURA