From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Jun 13 18:22:29 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07DB716A41C
	for <freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org>; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 18:22:29 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from peter@wemm.org)
Received: from daintree.corp.yahoo.com (daintree.corp.yahoo.com
	[216.145.52.172])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6A8343D48
	for <freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org>; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 18:22:28 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from peter@wemm.org)
Received: by daintree.corp.yahoo.com (Postfix, from userid 2154)
	id C3ACB197A9; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 11:22:28 -0700 (PDT)
From: Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org>
To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 11:22:28 -0700
User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2
References: <200506122320.j5CNKQAF023114@freefall.freebsd.org>
	<20050613021258.GA5242@dragon.NUXI.org>
	<20050613071337.GA25893@ip.net.ua>
In-Reply-To: <20050613071337.GA25893@ip.net.ua>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200506131122.28463.peter@wemm.org>
Subject: Re: amd64/82178: missing 32bit subsystem
X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform <freebsd-amd64.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-amd64>,
	<mailto:freebsd-amd64-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-amd64>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-amd64-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-amd64>,
	<mailto:freebsd-amd64-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 18:22:29 -0000

On Monday 13 June 2005 12:13 am, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 12, 2005 at 07:12:58PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 12, 2005 at 11:20:26PM +0000, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > > From: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
> >
> > Actually this isn't correct for 5.4.
> > There is a known issue that there are some missing bits in the 5.4
> > src/release/Makefile such that the 'base' tarball doesn't contain
> > the 32-bit ld.so and 32-bit shared libs.
>
> This should be fixed in Makefile.inc1, not in release/Makefile.

That looks a step in the right direction, but I wonder if we can have 
this stuff in a seperate sysinstall-selectable distribution instead of 
the base dist?    Or is adding a conditional platform dist going to be 
hard?

-- 
Peter Wemm - peter@wemm.org; peter@FreeBSD.org; peter@yahoo-inc.com
"All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars" - JMS/B5