From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 18 23:31:24 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D339916A400 for ; Tue, 18 Apr 2006 23:31:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mx21.fluidhosting.com [204.14.89.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4802943D45 for ; Tue, 18 Apr 2006 23:31:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 11071 invoked by uid 399); 18 Apr 2006 23:31:23 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO ?192.168.0.5?) (dougb@dougbarton.us@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 18 Apr 2006 23:31:23 -0000 Message-ID: <444576D0.5000603@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 16:31:28 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Maxim Konovalov References: <200604181900.k3IJ0rUC075126@freefall.freebsd.org> <44455CCF.7060106@FreeBSD.org> <1142977415.20060418234409@rulez.sk> <20060419014821.S73773@mp2.macomnet.net> In-Reply-To: <20060419014821.S73773@mp2.macomnet.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: docs/67893: [patch] boot(8)'s -m description is insufficient. X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 23:31:24 -0000 Maxim Konovalov wrote: > On Tue, 18 Apr 2006, 23:44+0200, Daniel Gerzo wrote: > >> Hello Doug, >> >> Tuesday, April 18, 2006, 11:40:31 PM, you wrote: >> >>> My understanding is that when something is committed to HEAD, the >>> state of the PR should be changed to patched, and then closed when >>> the fix is MFC'ed, is that no longer the case, or is my >>> understanding wrong? >> I would say, that it's still the way you wrote, but I noticed that >> not all commiters follow this rule :/ >> >> (FYI i'm not commiter, so I might be wrong, although I recall reading >> that somewhere, possibly on /internal/ pages.) > > Send a complain to core@ and they remove my commit bit from access ;-) > > Actually, I don't get it as a strict rule. I used to use "patched" > state as an MFC reminder for the critical from my POV PRs. For all > other I have different mechanism. > > And trust me, I don't forget to MFC this change to RELENG_6. > I'll keep that in mind for the future, thanks. Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection