From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 5 11:31:22 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C142516A469 for ; Mon, 5 Nov 2007 11:31:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nico-freebsd-performance@schottelius.org) Received: from denkbrett.schottelius.org (natgw.netstream.ch [62.65.128.28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83A6313C4B8 for ; Mon, 5 Nov 2007 11:31:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nico-freebsd-performance@schottelius.org) Received: by denkbrett.schottelius.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D824E1F132B; Fri, 2 Nov 2007 19:13:17 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2007 19:13:17 +0100 From: Nico -telmich- Schottelius To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20071102181317.GB6577@schottelius.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="+pHx0qQiF2pBVqBT" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: echo $message | gpg -e $sender -s | netcat mailhost 25 X-Unix-Info: http://unix.schottelius.org/ X-Netzseite: http://nico.schottelius.org/ X-System-Info: denkbrett running Linux 2.6.23.1-denkbrett on i686 Subject: NFS: Linux Server, FreeBSD clients X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2007 11:31:22 -0000 --+pHx0qQiF2pBVqBT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello! I'm doing some tests on a Linux 2.6 kernel nfsd with freebsd clients. I want to use a cluster of 2 servers with heartbeat as failover and use the linux server as nfsd. Currently I am testing with iozone, which gives pretty bad performance results for standard connection (about 1/10 of what the disks deliver under linux locally, although connected via copper gbit/s). Has someone some test / performance tuning hints for this situation? Sincerly Nico P.S.: Linux as server because running on dell 1955 makes the blade unmonitorable under fbsd. P.P.S.: The main usage will be mailserver, so many small files. --=20 Think about Free and Open Source Software (FOSS). http://nico.schottelius.org/documentations/foss/the-term-foss/ PGP: BFE4 C736 ABE5 406F 8F42 F7CF B8BE F92A 9885 188C --+pHx0qQiF2pBVqBT Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHK2i9uL75KpiFGIwRAlbdAKDUdPwgD80yN96FlWdTsfkJx/ENCACfcxKK rqxepv/QiKLtpK70MnbV59w= =oeA2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --+pHx0qQiF2pBVqBT--