From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Jun 23 10:08:23 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id KAA22205 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Tue, 23 Jun 1998 10:08:23 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from web-it-show.com (dns1.web-it-show.com [207.99.25.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA22149 for ; Tue, 23 Jun 1998 10:08:14 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from postmaster@web-it-show.com) Received: from web-it-show.com ([207.99.25.17]) by web-it-show.com with ESMTP (IPAD 2.05) id 5851300 ; Tue, 23 Jun 1998 13:11:56 -0400 Message-ID: <358FE0DA.A57A16D2@web-it-show.com> Date: Tue, 23 Jun 1998 13:07:43 -0400 From: System Administrator Organization: Web-It Show, Inc. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.04 [en] (WinNT; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Release schedule for 2.2.7 References: <005b01bd9eb2$3330b7c0$02dd71d1@fargo.os.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Craig Shrimpton wrote: > > > > If you've brought in generic improvements or fixed a bug with a driver > > you're responsible for in -current, take a quick minute to see if > > the work is also applicable to -stable. > > > > Especially any fix to the Series "E" Adaptec 2940UW driver. Adaptec says > the card is not broken but the drivers (the NT ones anyway) are > significantly different than the other revs. > > -Craig > This statement, in itself, admits the card IS broken! Why should there be different series E drivers for the same card model?! -- Henry Web-It Show, Inc. (609) 890-9227 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message