Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2006 14:02:47 -0800 From: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.org> To: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Daniel Eischen <deischen@FreeBSD.org>, current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: libpthread shared library version number Message-ID: <454A6B07.3090003@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20061102214157.GC2028@rambler-co.ru> References: <454936CA.6060308@FreeBSD.org> <20061102115058.GB10961@rambler-co.ru> <Pine.GSO.4.64.0611020824150.12236@sea.ntplx.net> <20061102140948.GA70915@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> <20061102182419.GC774@rambler-co.ru> <454A60E9.7020303@FreeBSD.org> <20061102214157.GC2028@rambler-co.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > On Thu, Nov 02, 2006 at 01:19:37PM -0800, Maxim Sobolev wrote: >> Ruslan Ermilov wrote: >>> On Thu, Nov 02, 2006 at 08:09:48AM -0600, Brooks Davis wrote: >>> Hmm, bumping not versioned libraries *now* and not bumping them >>> again at pre-release would work, but doing it without also bumping >>> "to be versioned" libraries is IMO pointless. And if we bump all >>> of them now, we'll have to bump some of them again when versioning >>> is turned on by default. >> No, we will not have to do it. Why would we? It's -CURRENT, so that >> nobody really cares about backward/forward compatibility within that branch. >> > I'd very much like NOT to have to recompile all of my installed > ports on my -CURRENT boxes the day we turn on symbol versioning, > and that will require the shlib major bump of those libs that > will provide symbol versioning. If we do the bump now, we'll > have to do it again later, and that's slightly against the rule > that we only bump them once inside a branch. Repeat after me: *we won't have to do it* since we don't generally care whether or not one have to rebuild all or some of his packages in current due to some ongoing changes. -Maxim
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?454A6B07.3090003>