From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 2 22:03:34 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: current@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9D5316A4CE; Thu, 2 Nov 2006 22:03:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sobomax@FreeBSD.org) Received: from sippysoft.com (gk.360sip.com [72.236.70.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD96143DA2; Thu, 2 Nov 2006 22:03:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sobomax@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [192.168.1.47] ([204.244.149.125]) (authenticated bits=0) by sippysoft.com (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id kA2M2sQJ015797 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 2 Nov 2006 14:02:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sobomax@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <454A6B07.3090003@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2006 14:02:47 -0800 From: Maxim Sobolev Organization: Sippy Software, Inc. User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ruslan Ermilov References: <454936CA.6060308@FreeBSD.org> <20061102115058.GB10961@rambler-co.ru> <20061102140948.GA70915@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> <20061102182419.GC774@rambler-co.ru> <454A60E9.7020303@FreeBSD.org> <20061102214157.GC2028@rambler-co.ru> In-Reply-To: <20061102214157.GC2028@rambler-co.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-U; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Daniel Eischen , current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: libpthread shared library version number X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2006 22:03:35 -0000 Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > On Thu, Nov 02, 2006 at 01:19:37PM -0800, Maxim Sobolev wrote: >> Ruslan Ermilov wrote: >>> On Thu, Nov 02, 2006 at 08:09:48AM -0600, Brooks Davis wrote: >>> Hmm, bumping not versioned libraries *now* and not bumping them >>> again at pre-release would work, but doing it without also bumping >>> "to be versioned" libraries is IMO pointless. And if we bump all >>> of them now, we'll have to bump some of them again when versioning >>> is turned on by default. >> No, we will not have to do it. Why would we? It's -CURRENT, so that >> nobody really cares about backward/forward compatibility within that branch. >> > I'd very much like NOT to have to recompile all of my installed > ports on my -CURRENT boxes the day we turn on symbol versioning, > and that will require the shlib major bump of those libs that > will provide symbol versioning. If we do the bump now, we'll > have to do it again later, and that's slightly against the rule > that we only bump them once inside a branch. Repeat after me: *we won't have to do it* since we don't generally care whether or not one have to rebuild all or some of his packages in current due to some ongoing changes. -Maxim