From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Feb 10 18:33:34 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56C3D106564A;
	Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:33:34 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from swills@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from mouf.net (unknown [IPv6:2607:fc50:0:4400:216:3eff:fe69:33b2])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1048D8FC14;
	Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:33:33 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mouf.net (www@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mouf.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q1AIXTRx085386;
	Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:33:29 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from swills@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from 198.85.229.5 (SquirrelMail authenticated user swills)
	by mouf.net with HTTP; Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:33:29 -0500
Message-ID: <74055e250bcebbcedd6e18d582dabdbe.squirrel@mouf.net>
In-Reply-To: <4F33F2B4.6070400@freebsd.org>
References: <4F33F2B4.6070400@freebsd.org>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:33:29 -0500
From: "Steve Wills" <swills@FreeBSD.org>
To: "Michael Scheidell" <scheidell@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.21
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Importance: Normal
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7
	(mouf.net [127.0.0.1]); Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:33:30 -0500 (EST)
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=4.5 tests=ALL_TRUSTED
	autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on mouf.net
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.2 at mouf.net
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: need 10. exp run? kusefs-kmod?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:33:34 -0000

I've got a 10-CURRENT build in my tinderbox. I'll kick off building it and
everything that depends on it there, on both 10-CURRENT and 7.x, 8.x and
9.x. I think exp-run is overkill for something non-infrastructure like
this. Assuming no build breakage, I'd say it's fine to commit.

Steve

> Tested on 8.2, and 9.0, tinderbox logs fine (you will notice scons tries
> to delete an extra egg... I will that, but that is a different pr)
>
> submitter has 10.0, maintainer has 8.2.
>
> Can I get some testing on 10.0 for this? pr has specific code looking
> for 10.x:
>
> +#if __FreeBSD_version>= 1000005
> ++    if (checkpath(dir, mntpath) != 0)
> ++            err(1, "%s", mntpath);
> ++#else
> +      (void)checkpath(dir, mntpath);
> ++#endif
>
>
> pr is http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/164218
>
> patch (with portsrevision added):
>
> http://people.freebsd.org/~scheidell/pr_164218_sysutils_fusefs-kmod.patch
> --
> Michael Scheidell, CTO
> o: 561-999-5000
> d: 561-948-2259
>  >*| *SECNAP Network Security Corporation
>
>     * Best Mobile Solutions Product of 2011
>     * Best Intrusion Prevention Product
>     * Hot Company Finalist 2011
>     * Best Email Security Product
>     * Certified SNORT Integrator
>
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>