From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 11:50:57 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45A3016A4CE; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:50:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from tatiana.utanet.at (tatiana.utanet.at [213.90.36.46]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59A7D43D62; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:50:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from josef@daemon.li) Received: from paris.utanet.at ([213.90.36.7]) by tatiana.utanet.at with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AgUYv-0002FW-00; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 20:50:53 +0100 Received: from dsl-30-9.utaonline.at ([81.189.30.9] helo=jenny.daemon.li) by paris.utanet.at with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AgUYu-0002iF-00; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 20:50:52 +0100 Received: by jenny.daemon.li (Postfix, from userid 1005) id 63F4F10D6; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 20:51:06 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 20:51:06 +0100 From: Josef El-Rayes To: Michael Ranner Message-ID: <20040113195106.GA321@jenny.daemon.li> References: <20040113093903.GA84055@mimoza.pantel.net> <200401131936.19411.mranner@inode.at> <20040113183838.GC48706@voodoo.oberon.net> <200401132038.01349.mranner@inode.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="0OAP2g/MAC+5xKAE" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200401132038.01349.mranner@inode.at> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Reply-Path: josef@daemon.li X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.9-STABLE cc: Kirill Ponomarew cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Status reports - why not regularly? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: josef@daemon.li List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 19:50:57 -0000 --0OAP2g/MAC+5xKAE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Michael Ranner wrote: > Also for this we must not reinvent the wheel, as Robert Watson thoughts > about kerneltrap, feeding this information to an already existing site > with a FreeBSD related column could be not a so bad idea. i see no reason why this should appear on an 3rd party page. i think this definitely belongs on our webpage, why do you want to outsource this? .josef --0OAP2g/MAC+5xKAE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (FreeBSD) iQEVAwUBQARMKVnFItmnnbU8AQJWiwgAr8ZNqAUnmWWvjFYou+JmtKNexg3XRvZV C/dTOAEzyW6OEfgh0AswHQO3w2kJbdiGObMsMCqfSTu7CUfFj3+Ta8TSJbMBuR2s 9JqBBfUruiVtvdhg+I35v/Gx04TNVFFsGqW/7OfknR7bZArGgory9U41m/7dNqeY fQoJgBqKcpNZP6Gr0PEqOIPcw6ndGOjhbRC+AWYbrE0FJw0tbBLCjPgzF49SNBJl QajQka9A95FS0GPqAlQyfKX6V1M06/nOzNIOgUL8f1+hvDcT3dB7o8AkOVQ73RuJ Db3GXMU1N1PFpWXF8EaHGiYHn9ijD/21DnkCUu0NccWgxTd8W8EPvg== =I25A -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --0OAP2g/MAC+5xKAE--