From owner-freebsd-audit Fri Aug 17 6:25:51 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-audit@freebsd.org Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [204.156.12.50]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEDDE37B403; Fri, 17 Aug 2001 06:25:43 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from arr@watson.org) Received: from localhost (arr@localhost) by fledge.watson.org (8.11.5/8.11.5) with SMTP id f7HDPhZ07792; Fri, 17 Aug 2001 09:25:43 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from arr@watson.org) Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2001 09:25:42 -0400 (EDT) From: "Andrew R. Reiter" To: audit@freebsd.org, security@freebsd.org Subject: login_cap Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-audit@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hey, Im wondering if there's any real interest for patches to be made for some services so that they do login class, etc authentication? Such an example would be for atrun.c in libexec/atrun/. In my opinion, it is probably worth doing and getting commited, but if no one would commit the patches, I dont see a point in doing them :-) btw, if you're unfamiliar with login caps, check out login_cap(3) and login_class(3). Andrew *-------------................................................. | Andrew R. Reiter | arr@fledge.watson.org | "It requires a very unusual mind | to undertake the analysis of the obvious" -- A.N. Whitehead To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-audit" in the body of the message