Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 12:48:58 -0400 From: "Mikhail T." <mi+thun@aldan.algebra.com> To: Kirk McKusick <mckusick@mckusick.com> Cc: fs@freebsd.org Subject: background fsck considered harmful? (Re: panic: handle_written_inodeblock: bad size) Message-ID: <4C45D37A.5020304@aldan.algebra.com> In-Reply-To: <201007201544.o6KFipaV084986@chez.mckusick.com> References: <201007201544.o6KFipaV084986@chez.mckusick.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
20.07.2010 11:44, Kirk McKusick ΞΑΠΙΣΑΧ(ΜΑ):
> Adding it to all the panic's will be a lot of work,
> but I agree would be useful. I will look into doing so when I
> get a chance.
>
> Kirk McKusick
>
How about disabling background fsck in a default install? It seems to be
the consensus here, that my troubles were due to fsck not fixing the
file-system properly reboot after reboot...
Yours,
-mi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4C45D37A.5020304>