From owner-freebsd-security Sat Jan 22 10:33:43 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from news-ma.rhein-neckar.de (news-ma.rhein-neckar.de [193.197.90.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5A33157E4 for ; Sat, 22 Jan 2000 10:33:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from daemon@bigeye.rhein-neckar.de) Received: from bigeye.rhein-neckar.de (uucp@localhost) by news-ma.rhein-neckar.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) with bsmtp id TAA05349 for freebsd-security@freebsd.org; Sat, 22 Jan 2000 19:33:22 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from daemon@bigeye.rhein-neckar.de) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by bigeye.rhein-neckar.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) id SAA68462 for freebsd-security@freebsd.org; Sat, 22 Jan 2000 18:41:47 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from daemon) From: naddy@mips.rhein-neckar.de (Christian Weisgerber) Subject: Re: Majordomo - ports or new version Date: 22 Jan 2000 18:41:46 +0100 Message-ID: <86cq4q$22r5$1@bigeye.rhein-neckar.de> References: <4.1.20000122115759.0091adc0@granite.sentex.ca> To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Mike Tancsa wrote: > but does anyone have any reccomendations on which to use ? .4 > patches out of the ports, or .5 direct from greatcircle ? Get .5, update the port, send-pr the diff. -- Christian "naddy" Weisgerber naddy@mips.rhein-neckar.de To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message