From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 30 02:59:42 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57F9F16A4CE; Thu, 30 Dec 2004 02:59:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.199.47.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F1FA43D49; Thu, 30 Dec 2004 02:59:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id EF85751194; Wed, 29 Dec 2004 18:59:38 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 18:59:38 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: Eric Anholt , Ceri Davies , cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, Michael Nottebrock , cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20041230025938.GA6056@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <200412292141.iBTLfnAf052451@repoman.freebsd.org> <20041229220451.GC50770@submonkey.net> <1104359333.854.38.camel@leguin> <20041230021649.GA1267@holestein.holy.cow> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="T4sUOijqQbZv57TR" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20041230021649.GA1267@holestein.holy.cow> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports UPDATING X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 02:59:42 -0000 --T4sUOijqQbZv57TR Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Dec 29, 2004 at 09:16:49PM -0500, Parv wrote: > in message <1104359333.854.38.camel@leguin>, > wrote Eric Anholt thusly... > > > > This directory needs to be made during startup by the system, i.e. > > not X.Org or XFree86. The only question is whether we're going to > > put the rc script in a common port, each of the ports that needs > > it, or the base system. I lean towards #3. >=20 > I sure hope there would be NO_ICE_DIR or some such knob for those of > us that have no use for KDE if the directory creation goes into the > base system. Let's all take up a collection to buy Parv a spare inode, instead. :-) Kris --T4sUOijqQbZv57TR Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFB028aWry0BWjoQKURAqXvAKDS4wFLkwqhOlQSrmDzgP5I8RBnOACgzGnM gWA+NbNIpRwHfe7mImF+EEg= =j7nw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --T4sUOijqQbZv57TR--