Date: Fri, 09 Jul 1999 16:05:03 +0900 From: "Daniel C. Sobral" <dcs@newsguy.com> To: Ask Bjoern Hansen <ask@valueclick.com> Cc: Seth <seth@freebie.dp.ny.frb.org>, Donald Wilde <dwilde1@thuntek.net>, Bill Fumerola <billf@chc-chimes.com>, freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Benchmarking web apps on Apache Message-ID: <37859F1F.3CDAB53A@newsguy.com> References: <Pine.LNX.4.10.9907081631540.9761-100000@impatience.valueclick.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Ask Bjoern Hansen wrote: > > tOn Thu, 8 Jul 1999, Seth wrote: > > ... > > mod_perl handler stuff). The "crucial" tests (dynamic content via cgi's) > > showed the other OS to edge out our beloved FreeBSD. > > Nah, get real. If you're concerned about performance, cgi will be your > last option. Err... Since cgi are widely used, you might want to consider that many people consider *CGI PERFOMANCE* to be very important. It's not a question of how to extract most performance out of it, but how much performance the system will give to what you actually have to serve. -- Daniel C. Sobral (8-DCS) dcs@newsguy.com dcs@freebsd.org Given infinite time, 100 monkeys could type out the complete works of Shakespeare. Win 98 source code? Eight monkeys, five minutes. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?37859F1F.3CDAB53A>