From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 28 21:59:14 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B960F16A401 for ; Tue, 28 Mar 2006 21:59:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brad@comstyle.com) Received: from mail.comstyle.com (toronto-hs-216-138-195-228.s-ip.magma.ca [216.138.195.228]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AAC343D60 for ; Tue, 28 Mar 2006 21:59:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from brad@comstyle.com) Received: from blar.home.comstyle.com (blar.home.comstyle.com [IPv6:2001:240:589:1::3]) by fubar.home.comstyle.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2904A2EDE for ; Tue, 28 Mar 2006 16:59:12 -0500 (EST) Received: by blar.home.comstyle.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 33CDE378D8; Tue, 28 Mar 2006 16:59:12 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 16:59:11 -0500 From: Brad To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060328215911.GA20602@blar.home.comstyle.com> References: <20060328205624.GZ20678@gremlin.foo.is> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060328205624.GZ20678@gremlin.foo.is> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i Subject: Re: 802.3ad? X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 21:59:14 -0000 On Tue, Mar 28, 2006 at 08:56:24PM +0000, Baldur Gislason wrote: > Following an unrelated discussion about "interface grouping" in OpenBSD, > I'd like to know if there are any known or planned implementations of LACP (802.3ad) > interface teaming in FreeBSD? > FreeBSD currently has etherchannel support, but to my knowledge that will only > work for a link to a single switch and not provide the possibility of having layer > 2 resiliance with paths to 2 switches in the same network. > Any thoughts on this? 802.3ad is the standards track replacement for EtherChannel, thus it is not what you are looking for. What you are asking for is L2 failover. OpenBSD's trunk(4) is such an implementation. I don't see anything in FreeBSD that would have the same functionality.