From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 5 02:23:51 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B354216A4CE for ; Tue, 5 Oct 2004 02:23:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from alpha.siliconlandmark.com (alpha.siliconlandmark.com [209.69.98.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DCED43D58 for ; Tue, 5 Oct 2004 02:23:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from andy@siliconlandmark.com) Received: from alpha.siliconlandmark.com (andy@localhost [127.0.0.1]) i952Nk3q015738; Mon, 4 Oct 2004 22:23:46 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from andy@siliconlandmark.com) Received: from localhost (andy@localhost)i952NkFf015735; Mon, 4 Oct 2004 22:23:46 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from andy@siliconlandmark.com) X-Authentication-Warning: alpha.siliconlandmark.com: andy owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2004 22:23:46 -0400 (EDT) From: Andre Guibert de Bruet To: Joshua Tinnin In-Reply-To: <200410041853.12931.krinklyfig@spymac.com> Message-ID: <20041004222123.G6673@alpha.siliconlandmark.com> References: <4160259A.3070708@FreeBSD.org> <200410041744.43292.krinklyfig@spymac.com> <200410041853.12931.krinklyfig@spymac.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner: Found to be clean cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 5.3-BETA7 available X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2004 02:23:51 -0000 On Mon, 4 Oct 2004, Joshua Tinnin wrote: > ldd /usr/X11R6/bin/* | grep libm.so.2 > > alone shows that quite a lot on my box is going to need rebuilding ... I > remember reading some posts about this a little while back. Is there > any way to do this with a fine-tooth comb approach, or is it just about > the same to do a portupgrade -af? libm is used by so many ports that you might as well do a portupgrade -af. At least you won't get unexpected behavior a few weeks down the line because you didn't rebuild the proverbial $xyz port. Regards, | Andre Guibert de Bruet | Enterprise Software Consultant > | Silicon Landmark, LLC. | http://siliconlandmark.com/ >