From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Jan 29 16:04:39 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id QAA22746 for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 29 Jan 1998 16:04:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from rah.star-gate.com (rah.star-gate.com [209.133.7.178]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id QAA22656 for ; Thu, 29 Jan 1998 16:04:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from hasty@rah.star-gate.com) Received: from rah (localhost.star-gate.com [127.0.0.1]) by rah.star-gate.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id QAA04028; Thu, 29 Jan 1998 16:04:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from hasty@rah.star-gate.com) Message-Id: <199801300004.QAA04028@rah.star-gate.com> To: Capriotti cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, hasty@rah.star-gate.com Subject: Re: /usr/src/release/sysinstall needs US. :-)) In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 29 Jan 1998 20:59:43 -0300." <3.0.32.19980129205927.0095e620@pop.mpc.com.br> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <4025.886118659.1@rah> Date: Thu, 29 Jan 1998 16:04:19 -0800 From: Amancio Hasty Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG X-To-Unsubscribe: mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org "unsubscribe hackers" I would go with Java mostly because of its application support frameworks available on win95 and hopefully we may be able to convince a company or two to make available their framework from the Dark Side to the Light Side (FreeBSD) 8) You can argue about java vs tcl vs whatever however the bottom line is the application framework . There are other parameters like performance ease of maintainability , etc... Cheers, Amancio