From owner-freebsd-chat Thu Nov 16 15:55:44 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from smtp01.primenet.com (smtp01.primenet.com [206.165.6.131]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 539ED37B479 for ; Thu, 16 Nov 2000 15:55:42 -0800 (PST) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by smtp01.primenet.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id QAA24770; Thu, 16 Nov 2000 16:54:39 -0700 (MST) Received: from usr08.primenet.com(206.165.6.208) via SMTP by smtp01.primenet.com, id smtpdAAAP7a4MF; Thu Nov 16 16:36:49 2000 Received: (from tlambert@localhost) by usr08.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id QAA04772; Thu, 16 Nov 2000 16:37:45 -0700 (MST) From: Terry Lambert Message-Id: <200011162337.QAA04772@usr08.primenet.com> Subject: Re: Turning on debugging in GENERIC To: nate@yogotech.com Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2000 23:37:45 +0000 (GMT) Cc: tlambert@primenet.com (Terry Lambert), chat@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <200011162327.QAA17347@nomad.yogotech.com> from "Nate Williams" at Nov 16, 2000 04:27:58 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL2] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > [ Moving replies to -chat ] > > > Q: What is the root cause of the desire for increased default > > diagnostics in GENERIC? > > [ SNIP ] > > What does this have to do with you not having the resources to dedicate > to CVSup or build -current? Are you going off changing the question, so > you can be 'right' again? No. I ignored the majority of your post because it was wrong, and posting a point-by-point rebuttal to -arch would have been an inappropriate use of the forum. It would also have been inappropriate to try and rebut it in other than the forum in which the post was made, so I did nothing. As a single point rebuttal, my home connection has been and remains ~28k, and my premise was predicated on both the fact that I have insufficient disk space on my scratch machines for a full tree, do not _want_ -current bits pulled into my main tree, and can afford neither the bandwidth nor the CPU cycles for what is frequently an iterative process of cvsup and build world. Your other points are equally easy to rebut. Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message