Date: Fri, 15 Nov 1996 15:10:53 -0700 (MST) From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> To: fenner@parc.xerox.com (Bill Fenner) Cc: fenner@parc.xerox.com, terry@lambert.org, hackers@freebsd.org, jdp@polstra.com, scrappy@ki.net Subject: Re: Sockets question... Message-ID: <199611152210.PAA27168@phaeton.artisoft.com> In-Reply-To: <96Nov15.135501pst.177557@crevenia.parc.xerox.com> from "Bill Fenner" at Nov 15, 96 01:54:58 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> >But on a blocking socket, it doesn't make sense to have to issue multiple > >system calls to read chunks of a whole message when you aren't going to > >do anything with it until all the reads have been satisfied? > > The CSRG apparently felt otherwise. They didn't have threads or aioread. Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199611152210.PAA27168>