From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 15 16:04:53 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65DB416A4B3 for ; Wed, 15 Oct 2003 16:04:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from atlissspam1.geac.com (mx1.geac.com [208.148.140.131]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2ACE143FE0 for ; Wed, 15 Oct 2003 16:04:52 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Martin.Minkus@geac.com) Received: from sydexgbh01.org.geac.com (unverified [134.128.222.22]) by atlissspam1.geac.com for ; Wed, 15 Oct 2003 19:13:07 -0400 Received: from sydexgmb01.org.geac.com ([134.128.222.24]) by sydexgbh01.org.geac.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Thu, 16 Oct 2003 09:04:25 +1000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6375.0 content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 09:04:25 +1000 Message-ID: <97CFE7EC2D15B746BB4EE7DEC8126BB4016AB871@sydexgmb01.org.geac.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: FreeBSD 5.1 stability Thread-Index: AcOTRTZuO4/cuNBVRUihcCpYgP/dwwAK2diQ From: "Martin Minkus" To: "Garance A Drosihn" , "Kris Kennaway" , "Valery V.Chikalov" X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 Oct 2003 23:04:25.0984 (UTC) FILETIME=[ADE8C800:01C39370] cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: RE: FreeBSD 5.1 stability X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2003 23:04:53 -0000 Well perhaps I'll hold off making world as I just cvsupped ;) Don't wanna lose any stability... -----Original Message----- From: Garance A Drosihn [mailto:drosih@rpi.edu]=20 Sent: Thursday, 16 October 2003 03:16 To: Kris Kennaway; Valery V.Chikalov Cc: Martin Minkus; current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 5.1 stability At 11:28 PM -0700 10/14/03, Kris Kennaway wrote: >On Wed, Oct 15, 2003, Valery V.Chikalov wrote: > >> >10:21AM up 101 days, 17:12, 1 user, load averages: 0.33, 0.58,=20 >> 0.44 > >> valera@don$ uptime >> 8:22 up 112 days, 17:14, 1 user, load averages: 1,34 1,69 1,72 > >I can beat both of you :-) > >11:07PM up 147 days, 48 mins, 0 users, load averages: 2.29, 2.29, 2.24 > >That's a sparc64 in the bento package build cluster. I hate to rain on this parade, but that only tells us how reliable 5.x was 147 days ago. 5.x remains in a state of flux, and there have been many times in the last 147 days where you could cvsup into a very unstable system. --=20 Garance Alistair Drosehn =3D gad@gilead.netel.rpi.edu Senior Systems Programmer or gad@freebsd.org Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute or drosih@rpi.edu