From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 21 17:48:28 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBDC516A41A for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 17:48:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fox@verio.net) Received: from dfw-smtpout1.email.verio.net (dfw-smtpout1.email.verio.net [129.250.36.41]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9EAB13C4CC for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 17:48:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fox@verio.net) Received: from [129.250.36.63] (helo=dfw-mmp3.email.verio.net) by dfw-smtpout1.email.verio.net with esmtp id 1JH0kz-0001ih-8D for freebsd-net@freebsd.org; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 17:48:25 +0000 Received: from [129.250.40.241] (helo=limbo.int.dllstx01.us.it.verio.net) by dfw-mmp3.email.verio.net with esmtp id 1JH0kz-0007P9-3c for freebsd-net@freebsd.org; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 17:48:25 +0000 Received: by limbo.int.dllstx01.us.it.verio.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id ABEDB8E296; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 11:48:18 -0600 (CST) Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 11:48:18 -0600 From: David DeSimone To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080121174818.GA11928@verio.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org References: <001b01c85c0f$6ca051d0$1e01c80a@John> <4794703A.4020801@FreeBSD.org> <4794CC56.2030802@tomjudge.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; x-action=pgp-signed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4794CC56.2030802@tomjudge.com> Precedence: bulk User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Subject: Re: help X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 17:48:28 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Tom Judge wrote: > > >> my question is how to configure 2 nics with different ip on same > >> box in the same subnet. > > > > Configure the second with a /32 prefix (netmask 255.255.255.255) > > instead of the usual netmask. > > Surely this configuration will cause all the reply's to be routed out > of re0 without some form of pfil layer manipulation? If both nic's are connected to the same broadcast domain, what difference does it make which nic sends the traffic? - -- David DeSimone == Network Admin == fox@verio.net "This email message is intended for the use of the person to whom it has been sent, and may contain information that is confidential or legally protected. If you are not the intended recipient or have received this message in error, you are not authorized to copy, dis- tribute, or otherwise use this message or its attachments. Please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and permanently delete this message and any attachments. Verio, Inc. makes no warranty that this email is error or virus free. Thank you." --Lawyer Bot 6000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHlNrhFSrKRjX5eCoRAgTEAJ9HgbLoMNiDUyI+3pPQr15ZofJjqACfUncG y6742bpKKJdP3iVrZiLQox4= =3cat -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----