From owner-freebsd-hackers  Wed Apr 26 12:00:13 1995
Return-Path: hackers-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id MAA21670
          for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 26 Apr 1995 12:00:13 -0700
Received: from trout.sri.MT.net (trout.sri.MT.net [204.182.243.12])
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id MAA21663
          for <hackers@FreeBSD.org>; Wed, 26 Apr 1995 12:00:09 -0700
Received: (from nate@localhost) by trout.sri.MT.net (8.6.11/8.6.11) id LAA18411; Wed, 26 Apr 1995 11:35:35 -0600
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 1995 11:35:35 -0600
From: Nate Williams <nate@trout.sri.MT.net>
Message-Id: <199504261735.LAA18411@trout.sri.MT.net>
In-Reply-To: Ed Hudson <elh@p5.spnet.com>
       "/usr/lib/sendmail vs /usr/sbin/sendmail" (Apr 26, 10:13am)
X-Mailer: Mail User's Shell (7.2.5 10/14/92)
To: Ed Hudson <elh@p5.spnet.com>, hackers@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: /usr/lib/sendmail vs /usr/sbin/sendmail
Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> 	i'd like to suggest a symbolic link for 2.1
> 
> 		/usr/lib/sendmail -> /usr/sbin/sendmail

Why?


Nate